The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 08:54, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Intercontinental Champion

[edit]

This article is already covered by WWE Intercontinental Championship and List of current WWE champions. This is most likely a snow speedy delete. S_RX 20:02, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- I don't know if it meets any speedy criteria, but it certainly isn't a necessary article. Like the nom said, its info is covered easily in other articles. Although, a possible re-direct after deletion might be in order, since that does seem like a plausible enough search term. Umbralcorax (talk) 20:18, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with WWE Intercontinental Championship. I've a feeling that there are other intercontinental championships/belts (boxing perhaps?) so a merge may be better than a redirect. Ged UK (talk) 20:46, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete merging would leave an inappropriate redirect, and it's already covered. 70.51.10.38 (talk) 07:06, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 20:12, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for obvious reasons that SRX stated. -- iMatthew _T.C. 20:38, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per iMatthew SuperSilver901 (talk) 16:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment wouldn't a redirect just been quicker? Otherwise Delete Darrenhusted (talk) 08:18, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.