The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 20:39, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Intense Hammer Rage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think this falls under WP:BLP1E (the band is not a living person but the members are). All the coverage has been from the legal issues surroundin the importation of one of their albums. Nothing here satisfies any of the wp:music points except #1 but that falls under the one event thing mentioned above. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:04, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The notable information is already appropriately covered in Censorship in australia. Neither a google search nor the article itself even attempt to give any further argument for notability outside of the censorship issue. Wickedjacob (talk) 11:34, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Would redirecting to Censorship in Australia#Music artwork (the relevant section of the Censorship in Australia article) as a plausible search term be an idea? -- saberwyn 19:36, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.