The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:45, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Industriales en Balanceo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to not be notable per WP:GNG. Looks to me like an advertisement written five years ago and not discovered. – Muboshgu (talk) 06:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 06:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 06:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: An article on a company, sourced to primary sources and directory listings. I see no evidence that this is more than a run-of-the-mill company going about its business: fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. (I have left the Industriales_en_Balanceo#Products section in place for the AfD, but it is so promotional as to merit deletion if this article did survive.) AllyD (talk) 08:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as promotional material sourced solely to non-independent sites. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:14, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.