The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 04:26, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Index of sexology topics

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Large set of broadly illegible links with some sort of broad concept that once may have had a purpose back in the murky days when Wikimedia software was even less capable than it is today, this list of links is unmaintainable despite several people's best efforts, and I question whether it is even useful. This page adds no value to Wikipedia, nor to any poor reader who stumbles across it Fiddle Faddle (talk) 22:53, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is why we have categories. - Mr X 23:41, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom, this is a candidate for category at best DavidTTTaylor (talk) 17:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.