The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted as a recreation of previously deleted content. My apologies, I didn't know this was a second nomination until Twinkle saved my nomination statement. Bearcat (talk) 03:00, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inanna Sarkis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced WP:BLP of a YouTube personality, with no discernible indication of notability. As always, YouTube personalities do not get an automatic inclusion freebie on Wikipedia just because they exist -- YouTubers get articles if and when they're the subject of enough reliable source coverage to clear WP:GNG, and not just because their own videos metaverify themselves. But there's no reliable sourcing being shown here at all. Bearcat (talk) 02:59, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.