The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 07:40, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imperialism effects on english language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Right now this article provides no useful information. "[The] English language has gradually evolved"... no, duh? Examples? Additionally, the page name itself is too awkward to be used for a future article. Delete. Guy Fuchsia 23:30, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I know that creole language is part of the result of this. 64.180.83.71 23:33, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, topic belongs in History of the English language, and the title is POV. --Dhartung | Talk 05:03, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not to mention even more directly International English, which discusses cultural imperialism. --Dhartung | Talk 22:46, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Legitimate encyclopedic topic, but this article contains no useful content, and the title is too oddly worded and capitalised to be worth redirecting to anything. EALacey 12:04, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It's not necessary to state the blindingly obvious. BTLizard 15:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.