The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Impact Press

[edit]

No assertion of notability —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:11, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of ~~notability~~ impact on news articles. I can't figure out what I can do against these false positives. Alexius08 (talk) 11:23, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:59, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:59, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable.

Keep. Some indications of notability. A Google Book search[1] shows it listed under "media" in a couple of Florida guidebooks, it's in Project Censored's guide to independent media and activism, a book called "Move the Message" about independent media, reviewed in Factsheet Five, as well as the periodical Maximum Rocknroll reviewing it as a music review source. It's been cited in the book Animal Rights in South Africa as well as Trained to Torture: A Statistical Analysis of Human Rights Violations published by the University of Wisconsin. Squidfryerchef (talk) 16:32, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.