The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, procedural speedy keep, wrong way to propose a merge. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:48, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Illegal prime

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is nothing about this article that cannot be adequately explained by illegal number. I propose merging the articles together. See further rationale in Talk:Illegal prime. Rockstone^{[Send me a message!]} 06:58, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Rockstone^{[Send me a message!]} 06:58, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Close according to WP:SKCRIT #1. Just go ahead and merge or propose a merge at WP:PROPMERGE. Thincat (talk) 09:04, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep per the sources found in the first nomination and as Thincat points out, AfD is not for proposed merges. --((u|Mark viking)) {Talk} 10:19, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:10, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.