The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus was article subject lacked notability j⚛e deckertalk 18:44, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ikea Monkey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dont really think this is notable enough for an article. Surely it could be merged into the 'Internet Meme' article? Mikeo34 (talk) 18:23, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:19, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:19, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:19, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: depending on the social discussion it spawns, a snippet may perhaps be merged to exotic pet or a similar article. The Canadian media have interviewed some biologists and animal welfare workers regarding keeping captive monkeys as pets. Mindmatrix 20:57, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Then again, there's nothing of value in the article at this time. Mindmatrix 20:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.