The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep --JForget 22:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Want It[edit]

Nothing to prove itself of its notabily, fails WP:NM, just not high enough to be included for this flop song - well I never neard of it, end of —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charley Uchea (talk • contribs) 04:17, 12 June 2008

• Delete Although, "I never neard of it" isn't remotely criteria for deletion. It does fail to meet notability criteria as I understand it. If the singer or the reality show are notable this can easily be included in their article(s). Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, it charted, there are sources out there, passes WP:MUSIC. WP:IDONTLIKEIT isn't a reason for deletion.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 00:52, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question Have I misread the criteria? Does just being on a chart make songs notable? I thought it was about having a high position on said charts? If I'm wrong and being number "63" is notable (AND the information is sourced and verified in the article) than change my Delete to a Keep. Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:16, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MUSIC has that lovely word "possibly" notable, which to me, leaves it very much up to people like us to decide which side of the keep/delete line this article falls. WP:MUSIC mentions whether it has charted or not, nothing about how far up the chart it has got. Since the only real reason we're here is because the Nom hasn't heard of it, and also doesn't like it (which is strange because he hasn't heard of it), I said keep.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 12:48, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The single is currently doing well in Europe and has charted in the UK. Also it has been inside the top ten Club charts across Europe. Highest position No.2 in the UK Club Charts. Also No.9 in the Upfront Club Charts. Ref to Chanelle Hayes main page. 'Charley Uchea' says she knows nothing of the single but has named herself after a Big brother 2007 contestant? Also this person is the same person who created the deletion page for Chanelle's main page that was kept. I smell vendetta. Can we take this deletion page seriously? I don't think so.Nightfactoy (talk) 22:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

u dont av 2 mr fanboi, ur speakin fanspeak as dis chart place is nowt, doesnt the top 10 is the one that counts, not the top millyun. herre sumthin 4u - u a ur m8s can make it mor "notable" by spending all your dosh, buy all her shit off from ur local hmv or wollys or woteva, and put mor orda. leas dis can help her 2 get a top 3 place, 'Charley Uchea' is me cos i am 'Charley Uchea'. i'm sorry to say dat dance cart thin is very tiviel nobodi take it seriusle —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charley Uchea (talk • contribs) 00:17, 17 June 2008

• Delete Isn't the Top 40 the most significant part of the British chart, anything else are totally ignored, had the single reached at least the bottom part of the Top 40, this article is likely to survive this AfD. This article is unverified hence my reason for deletion. Anton Ego (talk) 16:28, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Other than that, these charts seems to be a bit too trivial to make this single significant, especially that Upfront Club one as it does not have its own article well not likely with 235 ghits. Anton Ego (talk) 16:31, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...and on the other hand, I think this nomination is rather a bit too bad faith, considering the nom's attitude and her personal attack, but I wouldn't mind nominating this myself. Anton Ego (talk) 16:34, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - it has charted in the UK --T-rex 23:37, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It is still a current single. She is still promoting with club gigs, she had 2 this week and has two next week. It is too early to think of deleting this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianbaxter43 (talk • contribs) 21:58, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.