The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 15:37, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IMPERIAL-Newton Corp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not see anything notable about this company. The article is an advert for the company that was created by an employee of the company. This was a contested PROD by the creator. ~ GB fan 13:02, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:08, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:08, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - advert for unnotable metalbasher. . . Mean as custard (talk) 16:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Preserve - Not an advert, not created by employee. Mentioned in other categories by public, and notable for multiple reasons including manufacture of largest impact sockets in world, more than 480,000 sizes and shapes no other brand makes, as well as introduction of new lengths and drive sizes never previously created before by any brand. Notability must consist of more than advertising budget and stock listing? There are many similar companies listed here which are not unique but merely semi-recognizable names, as opposed to being notable for doing something unique within an industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueDog111 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • It does read like an advertisement and while you say you didn't create it the account that created is the same account you are editing from right now. You say this account was given to you. You have been told that is not allowed and you continue to edit from this account. Other companies having articles means absolutely nothing about this article. The only thing that matters is if reliable sources have provided significant coverage of the company. ~ GB fan 22:56, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

please note I did not continue to edit from the account, the edit was done expeditiously to try and correct things, prior to your comment above, and prior to creating this new account used here. I could not find a way to delete or cancel the account in question, if you know how please tell me. The newly edited content is factual and depicts why the company is notable. There is no promotion or call to action, nor solicitation of any kind. If you feel it can be reduced further to contain only fact while retaining the notability, please describe your objection or edit it accordingly we have no objection to any edits of any kind. We are simply interested in preserving a page that was created about us. disclosure: I work for the company.--Wiki5711 (talk) 02:00, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete absolutely no sourcing exists for WP:NCORP and WP:NOTPROMO Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:07, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No indications of notability, fails WP:SPIP, GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 22:21, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.