The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:19, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IBK salvation

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fancruft - Unsourced article with what I assume is a detailed explanation of a fictional computer game or book - no assertion of notability Travelbird (talk) 03:34, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unsourced, super esoteric, nothing notable about it.Alex (talk) 03:39, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, completely unsourced, in-universe description about a character in some work of fiction. The article doesn't even mention where the character appears, so I can't judge whether it's a major or minor character, but the lack of sources and in-universe style are enough to vote "delete". JIP | Talk 06:43, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non notable fiction if not WP:MADEUP. Only Google hit is the Wikipedia article. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.