The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. To the anon, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. —Kurykh 00:34, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I-set (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Originally tagged for speedy as spam. Reads like spam, but as it's a quasi-EU gov't program, it might be notable. Rather than speedy, I thought I'd seek a wider consensus. However, for my part, unless someone can come up with refs that demonstrate notability, I'm for deleting it. AKRadecki^Speaketh 17:49, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• delete. nonnotable unreferenced project with no traces online for googling "i-SeT" + eTEN +internet. `'Míkka 18:16, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The project will soon have a website, eTEN is for sure an EU programme, and it will be very usefull for Tourism Industry in Europe, as it will provide e-services to SMEs.(81.188.78.115 11:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]

• Delete - no reliable sources. Notability unestablished. -- Whpq 22:10, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.