The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 13:57, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I-20 (art gallery) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article on local art gallery that fails WP:GNG. Vrac (talk) 01:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I have added the nearest to substantial coverage that I could find touching on the gallery but it is primarily coverage of one exhibition and serves to verify existence. (There is also an Artforum review of the same exhibition, but that only mention the gallery as location, and a New York Observer piece provides passing coverage about a burst pipe flooding the gallery.) Unless someone can locate substantial coverage about the gallery itself, this falls short on WP:GNG / WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 08:09, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Insufficient coverage in reliable sources to support notability.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  02:07, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.