This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 00:07, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No content and no real potential for content either - I am an astronomer and I can't think of anything that would go in this article. Worldtraveller 14:56, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Mentioning every "hypothetical" object of any type is unlikely to provide anything coherent. It'd be better to have individual pages for any theorized celestial bodies. --Several Times 15:07, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. See above. JGorton 15:09, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, the individual articles are 'better'. -Splash 17:48, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No information content. ManoaChild 21:52, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete might work as a category but not an article. --Etacar11 23:51, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Pavel Vozenilek 16:49, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.