The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 05:29, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Human First Foundation

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable third party source can be found. No scope for improvement. Benedictdilton (talk) 17:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While a noble cause, it does not have sourcing to meet N or GNG. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:27, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 01:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No references and no RS sources found in web search. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Brendon is here 08:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 08:00, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.