The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) KCVelaga (talk) 00:23, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Huang Mulan

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. 3 sources, 1 is a amazon spamlink, and the 2 others are dead links. Fails WP:GNG. » Shadowowl | talk 20:00, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The All-China Women's Federation, Vision China Times Yibada and GBTimes have extensive coverage of this person.[1][2][3][4]. The Journal of Modern Chinese History gave an extensive review of her autobiography as well as extensive biographical information.[5] And these are all just English language sources. Most certainly much more exists in Chinese. --Oakshade (talk) 01:41, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:09, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the article needs serious improvement, but she's exactly the sort of figure Wikipedia should have articles on. Simonm223 (talk) 18:32, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.