The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per criterion A7, as an article about a company that does not indicate why it is notable or significant. Dabomb87 (talk) 05:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Home Mobility (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spam. db deleted (twice) by a new user who appears to have created an account solely for this purpose. (Do I smell a sock?) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:03, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Quickly" Delete Yes, I already know that recreation of deleted materials dbs are only for things that were deleted after AfD discussions, but that doesn't mean that I agree that it is a good idea. Also, fails WP:N, has no sources, ect. Sven Manguard _Talk 22:27, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete, db-corp, obvious sock removed the tag. Hairhorn (talk) 00:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.