The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 02:31, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Holmegammage[edit]

This town appears to be a hoax, judging by the lack of ghits for it: [1] and the fact Multimap.com does not find it either:[2]. There are no sources cited, and the major English place-name books, including A.D. Mills Dictionary of English Place-Names and also Eilert Ekwall's book on the subject, do not seem to have anything on it, and neither do any of the other books/material on English place-names. Unless sources can be found for this, I think it should probably be deleted per Wikipedia:Don't create hoaxes. --SunStar Net ^talk 20:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

delete Hoax. Senordingdong 22:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per WP:HOAX, and if it is not a hoax then WP:VERI. --Tλε Rαnδоm Eδι τ оr 22:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it's either a hoax, or impossible to very. In either case, deletion is the proper course of action. --Haemo 22:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No such place. ~ Infrangible 02:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.