The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:45, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hilary Wagner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable author. —Swpb^talk 18:14, 19 September 2014 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator - tagging for speedy deletion. —Swpb^talk 18:15, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I originally closed this since nom CSD'd article.... but the CSD's been declined so reopened...... (Not sure if nom wants to withraw or what.), –Davey2010 • (talk) 19:22, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to withdraw - the subject hasn't gotten any more notable. —Swpb^talk 14:03, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete. After removing the copyright violation I spent some time looking for sources when I first found this article in the RC feed. There are quite a lot of hits, but nothing of real substance (it's all blogs, etc.) so I think she falls below the notability standard. But it's close. QuiteUnusual (talk) 11:17, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I also did a pretty good search for sources and didn't find any. An article in WP may be premature for this author, who appears to have begun publishing only recently. The books are going into library collections, as per WorldCat.org, but so far I see no serious write-ups of her as an author. LaMona (talk) 14:55, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.