The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn - (non-admin closure) --– sampi ^{(talk•contrib•email)} 08:47, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

High Spirits (short story collection)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 10:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. I would think that this meets WP:NBOOK #5: "The book's author is so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable. This does not simply mean that the book's author is him/herself notable by Wikipedia's standards; rather, the book's author is of exceptional significance and the author's life and body of written work would be a common subject of academic study." Robertson Davies is among the most studied Canadian authors. Tchaliburton (talk) 21:24, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Also, some quick searching turned up the following reviews: University of Toronto Quarterly, Washington Post, Montreal Gazette, Boston Phoenix, Canadian Literature. Boleyn, you say you couldn't "establish that this meets WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG"; what steps did you takes to establish notability before reaching this conclusion? Tchaliburton (talk) 21:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn You're right, User:Tchaliburton. Thanks for your help, Boleyn (talk) 07:32, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.