The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Follicle-stimulating hormone. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

High FSH (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Any substantial content in this article should be part of FSH, in my opinion. The article describes a possible finding on a blood test. Richard Cavell (talk) 09:08, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge and redirect to FSH as per nomination. McMarcoP (talk) 09:48, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to Follicle-stimulating hormone as the above two editors have suggested. Location (talk) 04:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.