The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:32, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heung Kong Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable company UKWikiGuy (talk) 15:38, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. UKWikiGuy (talk) 15:38, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:45, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as it fails WP:NCORP. - Amigao (talk) 22:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I conducted a brief search and located numerous Chinese sources with SIGCOV, including but not limited to Securities Times[1], Xinhua News Agency[2], Wen Wei Po[3], Hong Kong Commercial Daily[4], Sing Tao Daily[5], HK01[6], and China National Radio[7]. Sufficient to fulfill GNG. @Amigao: Please take a look at the newly located sources. —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 07:06, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources found by Prince of Erebor. There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Heung Kong Group (traditional Chinese: 香江集團; simplified Chinese: 香江集团) to pass Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".

  Cunard (talk) 06:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources found by Prince of Erebor. After his research, I do believe the article meets enough to stay.

  Ashik Rahik (talk) 14:18, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.