The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 14:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Henri Sader (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

The article fails WP:BIO and WP:NOR. Failed candidate. Delete GreenJoe 20:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC) I am amicable with Merge. GreenJoe 04:38, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian electoral candidates are never deleted from Wikipedia. If they're not deemed notable enough for their own articles, then they get merged into a party candidates list such as New Democratic Party candidates, 2006 Canadian federal election. Merge. Bearcat 04:16, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notability is beyond candidacy. -- Earl Andrew - talk 17:38, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Earl. Ground Zero | t 15:47, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above. Giggy ^{Talk | Review} 04:33, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GreenJoe 04:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Notable; sources would be good though cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:06, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep well written and informative as well as notable --Childzy ^{(Talk|Images)} 13:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.