The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:52, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
American charity. Article clearly written by someone with a COI. Not sure of notability or precedents. Spatulli (talk) 22:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete. It's a marginal case, but the organization does not appear to meet the notability criteria of WP:ORG. The biggest problem is depth of coverage, which is why, I suspect, not much would be left if this article was stripped of its press release flavour and restricted to what can be established by reliable sources. The reliable sources that do exist mention the organization tangentially. Uncle Dick (talk) 17:36, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of♥♦♣ ♠ 01:11, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete' notability is hard to guage from the article but appears to be marginal, however the rather clear COI/advertising issues are enough to delete. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:39, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.