The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 13:59, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haydn Porter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Co-ed of the Month isn't a notable award per WP:PORNBIO. No work outside a few Playboy releases. Not all Playboy models are notable. This article was deleted once with a prod. Dismas|^(talk) 13:42, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Dismas|^(talk) 13:56, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking notability. X MarX the Spot (talk) 13:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete notability. DJ Clayworth (talk) 14:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, yes she is notable according to WP:PORNBIO unlike what the nominator claims. As Playboy is a major magazine (one of the ones mentioned in WP:PORNBIO if you read it). Mathmo ^Talk 15:21, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:PORNBIO does not say appeared a few times in a major publication, it says must have multiple appearences in notable mainstream media or be nominated for an award such as those listed in ''Playboy'' (or other major adult magazines). Therefore, fails WP:PORNBIO. Theseeker4 (talk) 15:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails to meet WP:PORNBIO. Tatarian (talk) 16:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:54, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No reliable sources, and doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 23:26, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep multiple mainstream appearances on Howard Stern verified by howardstern.com. [1][2][3] which satisfies criteria 3 of WP:PORNBIO. Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:05, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • In past AfDs there has been the general feeling that so many porn stars appear on Howard Stern that it isn't enough to establish notability. Although, until criteria 3 is ammended you're right that technically it does pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 09:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.