The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Garfield: The Movie. - Mailer Diablo 10:42, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Chapman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

besides the fact that this is a 'tough read,' this information can be found in the garfield movie article, and i dont think this character needs his own page the_undertow ^talk 06:55, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Garfield: The Movie per WP:FICT. --Dhartung | Talk 07:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect. I first noticed this article while RCP'ing and decided to go through the editor's other contributions, which indicated that the editor might be a newcomer who isn't too familiar with policy yet (ie. this example). To avoid being a biter, I decided to tag and keep an eye on the article and to go over it in a couple of days. Looking at it now, I'd agree that a simple redirect is probably the best course of action. -- Seed 2.0 12:49, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as above, not sufficiently notable as a separate character. -- Mithent 22:06, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect or Delete Not a notable character that needs his own page. Either redirect as listed above or simply delete the page. --Nehrams2020 07:53, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.