The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hapkido Boxing International Organization

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage of this organization from any independent reliable sources. The article's only sources and links are to its own web page or to youtube. I was also confused by the comment that is was not to be confused with an organization of the exact same name.Mdtemp (talk) 15:59, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Mdtemp (talk) 15:59, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Since Hapkido Boxing doesn't seem to be notable, it's hard to claim the organization in charge of it is notable. Plus there are no independent sources.204.126.132.231 (talk) 19:53, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:02, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I have to agree with the above comment. Hapkido Boxing was deemed not notable, so it's hard to see how an organization in charge of it is notable--especially when the article has no independent reliable sources. Papaursa (talk) 02:22, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.