The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hannah Dasher[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Hannah Dasher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable "viral sensation". Has may views on tik tok, but no critical notice, never had a charted single and no coverage in RS/extensive coverage upon which we can build an article. Oaktree b (talk) 20:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

With nearly a dozen or more other articles on this site for "viral sensations," I don't think your argument holds much weight. She's featured in a national ad campaign, headlining tours with major acts, written songs for others, and sang/played on other recordings, she's got enough information out there to build a case. There are similar musicians like her on this site that have never had a charted single. Where are these unwritten rules for creating an article for someone? And if there is such rules, who selectively follows them? Bluesman2383 (talk) 00:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, the rules of singers are pretty clear, see WP:MN. She's not appeared in published works, had two or more records/singles, has never charted nor certified gold. She likely also doesn't meet WP:BIO as we don't have multiple sources discussing her at length. Oaktree b (talk) 03:05, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
One small biography for the scholarship, rest are linkedin, tour bios and non-RS websites. She hasn't received enough critical attention for her works. Being featured in an ad campaign is fine, but we need things that talk about her, none of which we have. Oaktree b (talk) 03:08, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
She's been on Rachel Ray - there's a newspaper article in their from The Tennessean and a Billboard Magazine article. Not sure those are non-RS websites. Again, feeling like you are arbitrarily nitpicking. There's many others on here with far less that remain or are considered "stubs." Bluesman2383 (talk) 23:40, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Rachel Ray isn't a reliable source. Those other two might not be extensive. Oaktree b (talk) 14:19, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
More