The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW joe decker^talk 16:26, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hand finishing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, little context (so it doesn't qualify for CSD) and no structure. ɯɐɔ 💬 22:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I had originally PRODed this article for the same reason, but it was removed by the creator. — Chevvin 22:58, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:34, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:34, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unsourced. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:40, 18 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete WP:NOTMANUAL and unsourced. freshacconci (✉) 00:56, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - unsourced and hardly understandable. Also reads like a personal essay.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   07:23, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete I'm sure an article on this could exist on wiki, but this is not encyclopaedic. Porphyro (talk) 12:50, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as an unsourced personal essay (failing WP:NOTESSAY). -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 14:03, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.