The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:58, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hamdard (NGO) Ramban[edit]

Hamdard (NGO) Ramban (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are several issues with this article. 1. No significant coverage about the organization itself in any of the sources, most are passing mentions. 2. Puffery and attempts at promotion with too many images. Statements across the article are repetitive in nature. 3. No COI declared by article creator, have also removed the tag added to article. Removed PROD without fixing the issues. Previous attempts at creating the article has been speedy deleted per user/talk page. MT Train^Talk 14:43, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:43, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:43, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for the same reasons I PRODded the article - I cannot see that this organisation meets our notability criteria. All the coverage I can find appears to be passing mentions or other insignificant coverage. firefly ( t · c ) 17:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 16:43, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 18:11, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete — I see no significant coverage of the topic in sources, so I'll support deletion due to lack on notability (not meeting WP:GNG). Moreover, the concerns regarding COI and NPOV do exist. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 20:43, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and Kavyansh Happy editing--IAmChaos 22:21, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.