The result was Delete. CitiCat ♫ 04:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article has been deleted before. It now is revived with nothing to establish notability that I can see per WP:CORP. There are indeed references, but be careful to examine them rather than just consider them pretty enough: when I look through them they appear to mention, rather than feature Halogen for the most part. Some references do cover it more in-depth but they are investor resources, not necessarily a source of notability. Some are also broken. An editor who disagreed with the AFD the first go-around created this but I still don't think it's got notability. Epthorn (talk) 07:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article's illustrates a disturbing trend. Frankly, I am deeply suspicious of articles that spring into existence full blown, including infoboxes.[1] Many articles about non-notable software, communications, and consulting businesses seem to do this. I suspect that someone out there is offering lessons on how to suborn Wikipedia for promotional purposes.
The article content seems entirely in-house generated, and has strong NPOV issues, as you'd expect someone in marketing to write: provides Web-based employee performance and talent management solutions. As you know, I both condemn and contemn this misuse of the word solution, and consider its use in this manner a per-se breach of WP:NPOV. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:50, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]