The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There are a couple of merge votes at the end of the debate, but the only mention of "Halls Corners" in the Springfield Township, Allen County, Indiana is on an "unincorporated towns" list. The main issue in this debate is that there is no reliable source that Halls Corners is, or ever has been, a town. The name is apparently mentioned in some old newspaper articles, but without any indication as to if this is was an actual neighborhood, a crossroads, or just an estate or farm, there is an unresolved verifiability issue that mandates deletion. Sjakkalle (Check!) 18:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Halls Corners, Indiana

[edit]
Halls Corners, Indiana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I find no evidence that this was ever anything but a 4th class post office. Mangoe (talk) 15:55, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP Appears to be a census-designated populated place at one point, ergo WP:NGEO. BrigadierG (talk) 16:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that's true. CDPs are a relatively recent thing, and if there ever was one here, it should not be a matter of "appears to be". Listing in GNIS has been deprecated for some time, see WP:GNIS. Mangoe (talk) 18:34, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KSAWikipedian (talk) 19:05, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.