The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hatstand. Clear consensus that this is a duplicative term (future Mathematics aside) (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 12:29, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hall tree (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

First, Twinkle seems to be broken. Does everything but post the content here. Maybe it's just me? Anyway:
The most that can be said about this article is WP:ITEXISTS. There are currently no sources in the article, with the sole one having been removed last year for lacking relevance and other issues, and a search on Bing and Google reveals nothing other than companies describing their product as such. The article itself reads more as dictionary definition than an encyclopedia entry. Overall, I am nominating it for deletion on grounds of lack of notability.
However, I am a bit confused on this topic; there might be no specific guidelines for products or product classes, but I still wish to get clarification as to whether a similar matter exists for this as does flora and fauna, in terms of automatic notability, and hence why I brought it here rather than directly to prod. -- NoCOBOL (talk) 12:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.