The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep It's already been demonstrated that there are plenty of sources available to continue building the article, passing WP:WEB. I'd be looking for a bit more than "non-notable" as justification for deletion, particularly when that doesn't ring true. QuagmireDog18:59, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I remember seeing a rather massive article in Wired or somewhere which discussed Habbo Hotel. Notability appears quite well established. Zetawoof(ζ)20:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There are millions of gaia online users (OK, fine, there are millions of accounts. There are almost certainly at least hundreds of thousands of users, though) - I've never said anything about Habbo Hotel or any nonexistent raids in the entire time I've been on gaia online, I've never seen any discussion of it on gaia the entire time I've been there, and this is an ad hominem attack anyway. I nominated this because I remembered repeated assertions in the past by others on the talk page that the only reason it was notable was something that was itself unverifiable. As for not explaining it; in VFD's I've seen in the past, it seemed to most common to say something like "non-notable", "fancruft", "original research", or whatever else and then disappear off with no further explanation, so I honestly thought this was standard practice and no further explanation was necessary. --Random832T05:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's not an 'ad-homiem' attack, so please do not make statements such as that that cannot be verified. Note that I added a ':P' to the text, and as a user of Habbo Hotel, there are some nice gags that go on towards players of Gaia Online. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 05:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
:P isn't exactly clear in meaning among emoticons - i've always thought it implied derision [i.e. it would _enhance_ the perception that you're saying "since you're a gaia online user, you must be biased against habbo hotel" or whatever you were trying to imply] --Random832T06:45, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.