The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jagmeet Singh#Personal life. There is clear consensus that an article is not justified at this moment. Redirecting is a good ATD. Randykitty (talk) 08:27, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gurkiran Kaur Sidhu

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article doesn't meet WP:GNG. The article really only focuses on her marriage, and notability is assumed thereof (WP:BIOFAMILY), non-notable fashion company, with most references focusing on notable family members. Epluribusunumyall (talk) 23:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion, Politics, and Canada. Epluribusunumyall (talk) 23:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As article creator. I think the subject of this article meets WP:GNG due to the multiple reliable sources with significant coverage, examples include:
Indeed her wedding is the thing she is most notable for, but it is not the only thing she is notable for. E.g. item 2 above is literally pointing out eight things about her, item 4 above is about an ethics and corporate sponsorship issue.

WP:BIOFAMILY says Being related to a notable person in itself confers no degree of notability upon that person. Articles about notable people that mention their family members in passing do not, in themselves, show that a family member is notable. she is not mentioned in passing at all, she is the primary subject of the articles I cite above. So WP:BIOFAMILY does not direct us to delete this article, if anything it supports it being kept. CT55555(talk) 00:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. LizardJr8 (talk) 01:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I notified the WP:WPWIR project here. CT55555(talk) 01:47, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable fashion designer. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Delete. Dear @CT55555, I thank you for you Wiki contributions and I believe that you created this article in a good faith. However, the person is not notable. The sole presence of coverage doesn't guarantee notability. This person didn't do anything notable except one event, which contradicts WP:SBST. I am sorry to admit that I suspect the listed coverage to be WP:SPIP. Delete without a doubt. // MitYehor (talk) 16:26, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, noting the early preference for delete, if consensus continues towards not keeping the article, I would suggest a merging content and redirect to Jagmeet Singh as a WP:ATD. CT55555(talk) 16:35, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. Good try but I think its very very tenuous. scope_creep^Talk 16:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The ethics/corporate sponsorship issue is what tipped me over the line in thinking she was notable, not BLP1E etc, but BLP rules prevent me from putting that in the lead. CT55555(talk) 16:29, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CT55555(talk) 16:56, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Merge~~ to Jagmeet Singh as an alternative to deletion per WP:ATD. Relevant facts and sources can be merged into her husband's bio, particularly into the Jagmeet Singh#Personal life section. If/when there is more coverage about her own achievements, the content could be split back out into a standalone article. Cielquiparle (talk) 11:11, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable fashion designer fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Changing !vote to Redirect to Jagmeet Singh#Personal life since it seems this article is likely headed for deletion. Changing it to a redirect will 1) preserve the article content and sources in the redirect history, for future reference if needed; 2) allow people searching for Gurkiran Kaur Sidhu to quickly find relevant information about her (with 3k+ views in less than a month, there is clearly demand for more info); 3) discourage other editors from re-creating the article prematurely. Also, redirects are cheap per WP:CHEAP. Cielquiparle (talk) 10:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.