The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete under G12 by Materialscientist. (non-admin closure) Altamel (talk) 23:26, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gurdip Singh Anand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod removed multiple times by author. Could not see any signs of notability. Lakun.patra (talk) 19:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 19:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 19:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Non-notable individual. reddogsix (talk) 19:52, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Clear case of Copyright Violation. Have tagged it for CSD G12. Lakun.patra (talk) 19:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-not notable. Wgolf (talk) 19:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment, removing a PROD once is enough to contest it. WP:PROD is supposed to be simple, not a reason for edit wars. –Be..anyone (talk) 20:42, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment-it was a BLP prod not a normal prod. Wgolf (talk) 21:19, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.