The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GunBroker.com[edit]

GunBroker.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article contains no useful information to a person using Wiki. Furthermore, the references that it does list do not pertain to any of the information used on the page. keystoneridin! (talk) 03:59, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete, under CSD A7 criteria. Use ((db-web)). ^blurred_peace ☮ 04:30, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, CSD, as stated before, no longer applies and has a good enough start with key references. ^blurred_peace ☮ 01:07, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  04:42, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I have attempted a rewrite. CSD A7 no longer applies. It is much improved. Capitalismojo (talk) 05:29, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Has a good start, but needs some major revamps and cleaning up. Renaissancee (talk) 12:56, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Plenty of sources to meet WP:GNG. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.