The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 11:49, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Guillermo Pomi[edit]

Guillermo Pomi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO. ambassadors are not inherently notable. LibStar (talk) 07:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Uruguay-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not notable. --OpenFuture (talk) 13:58, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – Meets WP:BASIC, albeit on a weaker level per sources I was able to access online. ^[1], ^[2], ^[3]. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.