This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Redwolf24 04:28, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just finishing the nomination. No vote from me. ~⌈Markaci⌋ 2005-08-16 T 03:50:13 Z

This is non-encyclopaedic. Constituency agents and parliamentary researchers are not notable or even public figures. YBF is of minor importance in itself and Mr. Smith's greatest significance is as a board member of a Conservative Party pressure group. I also suspect (I can't determine this because it's transwikied from wiktionary) that it's autobiographical. Matthew Platts 22:15, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, marginally associated with politics, does not meet the biography criteria.--nixie 22:29, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. "Chief of Staff to Greg Hands MP"? MPs have at the most three staff so that's a really pompous title. David | Talk 22:48, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, British politicians are masters of making themselves seem more important than they really are. the wub "?/!" 10:33, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per above. Dottore So 19:10, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. -Splash 20:01, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not interesting, non notable. Secretlondon 05:04, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.