The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Four reviews have been added after the nomination had been made. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 16:42, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Green Thumb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Appears to fail Wikipedia's notability guidelines for books. Google Books and Google Scholar searches reveal little to support this article. Neelix (talk) 19:27, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as it meets WP:GNG. A reception with 4 citations has been added, thanks to Tokyogirl79 showing this book is notable.Coolabahapple (talk) 14:58, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.