The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 11:19, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Green Meadows, Indiana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A subdivision which isn't there at all in pre-1960 topos and aerials. No claim for notability so after a de-PROD without explanation, here we are. Mangoe (talk) 11:12, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:18, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As per WP:GEOLAND, place is appears to be inhabited and although unincorporated is still officially recognised, it just needs to be expanded. N1TH Music (talk) 16:01, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:GNIS for an explanation of why AfD has not considered GNIS as official recognition for a long time now. Mangoe (talk) 18:02, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mangoe Good point, but I checked a couple maps and there appear to be buildings there. To pass GEOLAND a place must be both Legally Recognised and populated, all these discrepencies are covered by the fact that the place must also be populated. N1TH Music (talk) 14:36, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Before I removed the PROD, I looked and found quite a few articles about Green Meadows on newspapers.com, and maybe some others as well. I will come back and post some of them to demonstrate that it satisfies WP:GEOLAND, within a couple of days, unless someone else gets to it first. Jacona (talk) 16:37, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Here are some articles about cancer clusters in Green Meadows possibly caused by hazardous waste from Purdue University: [1],[2],[3]. More on that subject are available. Then here are some on the governance of the Green Meadows Utility governance (they had their own water and sewage, unlike most run-of-the-mill neighborhoods. [4],[5],[6],[7]. There are many more articles on that subject. There's a lot of other stuff including this, plenty more if you bother to look. [8] Meets WP:GEOLAND, meets WP:GNG. Jacona (talk) 15:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keepper sources provided. Satifies GNG. Djflem (talk) 16:51, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.