The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:06, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greeley Griswald Light Show (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Okay, a family has put more Christmas decorations on the house than the average American. So what? Delete.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:06, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• The reason this is wanted as a page is because they work very hard to prepare the lights and music each year, it's amazing what they do, and to inspire people to decorate their own houses for the holidays. Plus, it should be popular. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Funwiki12 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • … which has nothing to do with an enyclopaedia. This is an encyclopaedia, not an advertising billboard. We're here to neutrally systematize and summarize verifiable knowledge, not advertise good works. You must show that your writing is, truly, about things that are already properly recorded and documented parts of the general corpus of human knowledge. Uncle G (talk) 01:46, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete A Google search under both spellings of the surname resulted in zero results. The abundance of exclamation marks displays the lack of the neutral point of view in the writing. Wikipedia articles can be about fun topics, but "fun" is not, in itself, a valid claim to notability. Call me Scrooge, but this display isn't notable. Cullen328 (talk) 02:06, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The article does not assert the notability of the subject, and is unreferenced. RadManCF ☢ open frequency 02:41, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 03:14, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete! Too many exclamation marks! Too little notable information! Too bad! EEng (talk) 17:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, possibly speedily. The "History" section is largely irrelevant to the subject and the rest is G11. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:50, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.