The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:48, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Granada Cinema (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There were literally hundreds of Granada Cinemas at its peak. This disambiguation page should be deleted to encourage article creation. Launchballer 00:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:48, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete There are three articles here; two are differently-named (I re-named the Woolwich venue to its current name), one simply doesn't exist. Right now, this isn't disambiguating anything and a simple link-out to Granada plc should suffice for any former venue. Nate • (chatter) 01:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – I cannot see which criteron under WP:R#DELETE is being used and the proposer does not mention which of these criteria is being used. Therefore keep. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 09:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep valid dab with 3 entries meeting MOS:DABMENTION. This is exactly what dabs are for. Boleyn (talk) 10:00, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Deletion does not encourage article creation; quite the contrary as deletionism tends to have the effect of driving good-faith contributors away. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:14, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This appears to be a perfectly valid disambiguation page (although the picture should be deleted). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:01, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:D "It is necessary to provide links and disambiguation pages so that readers typing in a reasonably likely topic name for more than one Wikipedia topic can quickly navigate to the article they seek." The page does what it says. Lightburst (talk) 23:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Obvious keep. Perfectly valid disambiguation page. Obviously we only keep articles about notable Granada Cinemas. "Encouraging article creation" is not a valid reason for deletion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:29, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep to provide access to three valid articles. Nothing here to discourage future article creation. PamD 15:42, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.