The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Glyptidotea_lichtensteini[edit]

Glyptidotea_lichtensteini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

delete Non-notable subject only referenced in certain list of marine lives. Google search and scholar shows limited results originated from the same source (first reference). Lack of secondary reliable sources. Should belong to wikibio according to Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_directory. Xinbenlv (talk) 05:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Snow keep Valid species, suitably sourced start-class article, just like tens of thousands of other species articles; WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES etc. A rather sad revenge nomination. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 06:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw Delete Nomination Elmidae, good to know, thanks for pointing to WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES. still learning yet. Xinbenlv (talk) 07:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.