The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 06:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glorimar Ripoll (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This looks like a vanity article, and notability has not been established. Peeper (talk) 14:30, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No claim to notability is made, hence nothing can be verified. Claims she is an advisor to a political party, but the party does not appear to be notable (to the point that this is the only document on the Internet using the English translation of its name). Claims she is an entrepreneur, but gives no details of her business, except to say it has not yet launched. Student projects and internal university awards do not make notability. And that's all the article has to say about her. JulesH (talk) 15:30, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable. KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.