The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 21:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Giles peters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Having had an article written about him in a daily paper about his starting a business at a young age doesn't seem to meet a reasonable definition of notability. I previously speedied it, restoring for AfD per request. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 16:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 16:37, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. Not highly notable, but non-trivial news storiews in two news outlets seems to me to pass WP:BIO if only just. DES ^(talk) 16:49, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • If kept, should be moved to Giles Peters, per naming conventions. DES ^(talk) 16:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete, not quite notable (yet). Realkyhick 17:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I don't thisnk this person has had enough media attention yet to appear on wikipedia. And there are loads of young entrepreneurs that are not actually on wikipedia, so until this person becomes properly "famous" I think this page should be deleted.
• Weak keep and rename per DES. Bearian 23:53, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.