The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gibraltar Socialist Labour Youth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A branch of a Gibraltar political party fails WP:NORG. No WP:SIGCOV in any WP:SIRS. (A couple of churnalistic sources are available, but as WP:INTERVIEW-based journalism they would be considered primary sources.) Moreover, WP:BRANCH would apply since it's a sub-organization of the GSLP. Sources in the article don't even reference the subject. As an alternative to deletion, I propose to redirect to Gibraltar Socialist Labour Party as was previous done prior to reversion by the creator. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Politics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Redirected as ATD, but now we have no ATD... Agree totally on lack of notability! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:38, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.