The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mackensen (talk) 16:11, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gerry Turley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ARTIST. - MrX 11:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete appears to be a fine illustrator, but the refs are about the books he illustrates and/or the book authors, and not about him.HappyValleyEditor (talk) 00:59, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable illustrator.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can find no coverage in reliable secondary sources. In the fullness of time, the subject might become notable. But not now. David in DC (talk) 15:50, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as the NYTimes source barely mentions him, there's simply nothing else actually convincing. SwisterTwister talk 18:54, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.