The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn (non-admin closure) Viztor (talk) 17:29, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Geraldine Weir-Rogers v. Sf Trust Ltd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

law case with no notability. we are not repo for that, these belong to wiki source. Viztor (talk) 19:34, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Viztor (talk) 19:34, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Viztor (talk) 19:34, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's a Supreme Court case so it is clearly notable. The article could do a better job of indicating the notability--although the article does cite two secondary sources: a key text book on tort law that references the case and the canonical Irish Law Reports Monthly. AugusteBlanqui (talk) 21:26, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: (but rename). Indications are the name of the litigant is Weir-Rodgers not Weir-Rogers as per the article title. As soon as we have the searching and the googling for the Weir-Rodgers several newspaper references come tumbling out. Of note the article was the subject of an subject of a Wikipedia educational assignment in March 2019. I might have hoped previous scrutiny including the WP:BEFORE and the educational assignment would have mentioned this issue with the name.Djm-leighpark (talk) 05:57, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and rename to Geraldine Weir-Rodgers v. SF Trust Ltd (the 'F' needs to be capitalized too). I will add additional content from secondary sources. AugusteBlanqui (talk) 09:50, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep per WP:SNOW - Meets WP:CASES criteria 1. End of story. Hugsyrup (talk) 11:03, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdrawn per above. I can't find anything with the original title, so. Viztor (talk) 17:29, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.